Siddaramaiah, chief minister of Karnataka, on tuesday charged bjpThe JD(S) says that after the High Court rejected his petition challenging the governor’s consent for an investigation into the land allotment case of MUDA, the party was engaged in activities to overthrow the Congress-led administration in the state.
Claiming that he is being harassed by the National Democratic Alliance Father of the Nation BJP and its partner JD(S), Siddaramaiahadebisedin бити through fabrication. “We will continue our court fight in defence of the unsupported allegations of RajNath Singh, the chief of JD(S)How will it prove be necessary?
“I have nothing to hide and welcome any probe that can be conducted, ‘I have my way of trusting there is an arm to investigate’. said the chief minister.
CM Siddaramaiah at the news conference said that the BJP and secular janata dal will not be able to bring down the present congress rule in the state.
“They may have managed it once but not anymore this time. This is not a nagpal. Their Slipper will sit with the slay of legal experts and ministers on strategy to hurt thsi and acties to aharte of move the further reports for this scenerion. We will face the threats of the BJP andJD(S) conspiracies as well as the whiling of our governor’s office, My affair with the high command and the party leadership helped too.
He remained adamant that he was not alone in this political contest because the people of the state were in support of him.
“I have faith in law and constitution. The truth shall eventually prevail in this tussle. This is a tussle with the vindictive nature of the politics in the BJP government led by Modi. There will be more battles against this vindictive conventional politics of the BJP and JDS.
MUDA Compensation land Bemul Parvathi appeared more abusive amenities situated in the high-class sector of Mysore compared to the present land location ‘acquired’ by MUDA to Parvathi. Gehlot Thaarachand said on August 16 in his consent to the allegations of the petitioner under the provisions of Act No. 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 also contained.
Pradeep Kumar SP,np, Social activist T.J Abraham and Snehamayi Krishna filed a petition against Siddaramaiah over the alleged land scam in MUDA. They had claimed that Siddaramaiah abused his position by creating fake documents for 3.17 acres of land within the vicinity of Mysuru city and allotted 14 plots under MUDA in the name of his wife.
On August 19, Siddaramaiah moved the High Court for judgment against the consolidated order made by the Governor prohibiting him from exercising his legal power and authority or parliamentary powers.”
A single judge bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna reserved judgment on 12th September 2018. The arguments in the petition that the family of the petitioner is the only beneficiary or crime is committed warrants investigation. A prayer was made to dismiss the petition.
“Investigating authorities investigate complaints by the complainants only on the basis of the proper order, be it at the stage of registration of the complaint or at the stage of obtaining the approval of the governor.” As a reference to how cases are argued in the court she stated “Not the end of smooth sailing.”
“Shama, a spokesperson of the Congress said, regarding the mainly restrained CM Siddaramaiah exploring other avenues even after the high court set back. The case relates to the fact that some MUDA land is generally considered to have been built on.” Shama also took on the BJP and GD (JD) and said when MUDA was providing land, the leaders of both the parties were also provided with land after the divisions.
“This land was then circumscribed to many leaders off JD(S) and the BJP. This was in the era when Karnataka was ruled by the BJP. There is a verdict today but all other avenues will be explored by the state chief is Mr. . Who is son of Karnataka BJP chief? People just have to keep quiet and they to solve the problems withour making all these complaints.”
‘We have an ‘impeachable’ documentary evidence on this charge against the Cm.’
The complainants in this case were happy when the Court dismissed Siddaramaiah’s petition.
“We have moved before the high court asking for dismissal of Siddaramaiah’s plea. Whatever the objections we raised even now the order has been passed. Which is I suppose a matter of happiness for us,” Justice M Nagaprasanna said Abraham told reporters shortly after a judge dismissed Siddaramaiah’s petition.
However, do you want to move further still? do you expect that the chief minister shall appeal today before the division bench? Abraham says, “Let him appeal before the division bench, if he has legal right and he will do so. As he transfers.Now it has been time for this division bench of considerable help.
“We wish to place it on record that with tens of thousands of pages of documents before the contemplating authority of the High Court it contained assertions against former CM Siddaramaiah. Therefore this order was made,” Krishna said.
Krishna of reading there was ‘unshakable’ documentary evidence against the cm “Whatever court he would go, he is going to lose.”
