The High Court of Punjab and Haryana rejected Subhash Yadav’s anticipatory bail defense.
He was the headmaster of a private school in Mahendragarh district of Haryana where on April 11, there took place an accident that claimed lives of six pupils.
The principal, who is also the overall custodian of the school, is saddened by this heart-wrenching incident saying that this kind of accident has been a big loss to all of us and it is impossible to exaggerate how terrible it was for those families affected. Estimated.
In refusing to grant interim bail to the principal of the school, HC observed that enough evidence had been collected by investigators, which prima facie showed that Dharmender had consumed alcohol on April 11 in an unlucky morning when he drove his bus thus killing six bright people while lost many students with serious injuries thereby destroying families and lives. Intoxication may result in cognitive impairment leading to errors in judgment and informed decision-making.
“Before entrusting children’s lives to these drivers or allowing them drive them from side to side schools;” avers HC adding “even after such a devastating incident, no enhancing steps had been taken either.” There is still a long way before any responsibility can be realized by the authorities,” said The administration also failed to wake up from its slumber and move away from the constitution for better governance Long path hence Families with mystic silence suffer most unbearable pain,” according to HC as it rejected anticipatory bail plea against accused.
Subhash Yadav Director Ministry Of Justice Had Moved The Supreme Court Anoop Chitkara J SC In Rejection Plea Passed Orders By GL Public Samiti Convenor Responsible For Running GL Public School Kanina And Overall Administrator Of The School
Petitioner has moved High Court for arrest under FIR against him for dereliction of duty coupled with gross negligence endangering student’s safety. Manslaughter haryana police
Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that he was not the driver or owner of that bus. The petitioner posited it is the fault of the bus driver and therefore his custodial questioning is pointless.
The bench dismissed the plea saying no one among even responsible officers from school management could verify whether on that fateful date, this driver was in a healthy mind and sobriety to duly work.
